From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FZyrn-0001hY-Iw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:28:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3TNRwIF004195; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:27:58 GMT Received: from pilet.ens-lyon.fr (pilet.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.167.16]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3TNPs77008345 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:25:54 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pilet.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F22D15B937 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:26:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pilet.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pilet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00484-54 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:26:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (amerique.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.50.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pilet.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB0C15B93E for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:26:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:26:41 +0200 From: Alexandre Buisse To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union Message-ID: <20060430012640.GB7596@ubik> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428185501.GA22506@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20060428192434.GB22373@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <44527A01.3080506@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44527A01.3080506@gentoo.org> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.17-rc1-mm3-ubik i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr X-Archives-Salt: 0336dc03-fd9a-40f4-b366-98b0ec506da3 X-Archives-Hash: d93b269aab39a3ccb0224016a6de962d --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:55:57 +0200, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Tim Yamin wrote: > >Speaking of which, has anybody done any tests with svk?=20 > >(http://svk.elixus.org) > >And: http://svk.elixus.org/?WhySVK -- it would be interesting to compare > >checkout performance on it as well. >=20 > I've been planning to do a more detailed comparison of all the popular=20 > SCM's out there for probably 6 months, but I just don't have the time=20 > right now. If someone wants to pick this up, please let us know. The opensolaris project has done a similar thing[1]. The three finalists were bazaar[2], mercurial[3] and git[4], and the winner was eventually mercurial. This is also the recommended choice from the EuroBSDcon slides, so definitely something to consider. Regards, /Alexandre [1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.h= tml [2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ [3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercur= ial/ [4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt --=20 Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEVBJQwx9vvAARv2sRAkITAJ9rZVIxzPToZZlTgE6rWTz6me4LiwCgruPb sHzViXZWoS0YJyHusn1waMI= =eeAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list