From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FZaSv-0007Cb-R6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:25:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3SLOjWJ031785; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:24:45 GMT Received: from watcher.kimaker.com (c-67-169-29-182.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.29.182]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3SLKhib026707 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:20:43 GMT Received: by watcher.kimaker.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2D88475858D; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:20:43 -0700 From: Ryan Phillips To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ferdy@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union Message-ID: <20060428212043.GF63263@watcher.kimaker.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ryan Phillips , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, ferdy@gentoo.org References: <20060428171453.GB62035@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428185501.GA22506@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <20060428192434.GB22373@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <44527A01.3080506@gentoo.org> <20060428204240.GD63263@watcher.kimaker.com> <20060428210543.GC26082@ferdyx.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xkXJwpr35CY/Lc3I" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060428210543.GC26082@ferdyx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 0a557f82-6caa-4024-9498-7d134d74432c X-Archives-Hash: 535adf172cb38cdad947873911f5e12d --xkXJwpr35CY/Lc3I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Fernando J. Pereda" said: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Ryan Phillips wrote: > > cogito > > - Not practical > > * the lots of little files doesn't scale well with the size > > of the portage tree >=20 > Sure, that's why they invented git repack. >=20 > > * In addition, git only allows checkins from the project parent. > > A deal breaker in my opinion >=20 > That's not true at all. Not in any sane Git version. Ferdy: What I meant is, if you have a change within one directory pending a commit, and you have a commit pending in a current directory, both files will be picked up for the commit. I think that is bad. That means you can't have pending changes not ready for commit and commit something. =20 yes. git-commit will allow the commit, it will walk the directories backwards, but it will find all the pending changes and want to commit them. I don't think that is beneficial. I'm open to comments though. -ryan --xkXJwpr35CY/Lc3I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEUocq6cLeDQrpxL8RAs31AKCV9BpQQj5xIHxzJPDLpYelA9mrXQCghzH1 z9bKwyShfvoV54WWaRAO6nQ= =n8NU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xkXJwpr35CY/Lc3I-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list