From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FXx7i-0000dz-Um for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:12:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3O9C8xp010565; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:12:08 GMT Received: from mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3O9A8NR013970 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:10:08 GMT Received: from localhost (M2619P029.adsl.highway.telekom.at [212.183.59.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3O9A4GF025363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:09:50 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi Message-ID: <20060424090950.GC10143@superlupo.rechner> References: <20060422145220.GA16068@osgiliath> <20060422193653.GA19581@phaenix.haell.com> <20060422202328.GC17673@osgiliath> <20060423010302.GA26452@phaenix.haell.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rQ2U398070+RC21q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060423010302.GA26452@phaenix.haell.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r796 (Linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 129.27.10.18 X-Archives-Salt: 10025111-62de-4f47-a95d-a0a43cf002d4 X-Archives-Hash: c522a292c72cf7c3e02d05cc12e5e35c --rQ2U398070+RC21q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 07:03:02PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My > apologies. I should have looked for that before responding. >=20 > Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to > 2.6.10, I'm going to speculate that the arm, sparc, and s390 crowds are > not so interested in that particular module. It's x86 only, some stuff for thinkpad laptops. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --rQ2U398070+RC21q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFETJXeK/GNBBblp4ARAve4AJ43SbSmO4nYIQf4sCLf+msS94YLygCdFPR+ JyejDIfQPbwOhG0+ZKagCAg= =u5+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rQ2U398070+RC21q-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list