From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FXT2j-0007HZ-Nx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:05:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3N14utE029847; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:04:56 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3N1335A007974 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:03:03 GMT Received: from c-24-10-122-88.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.10.122.88] helo=phaenix.haell.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FXT0B-00029P-4i for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:03:03 +0000 Received: by phaenix.haell.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90D7A1D8F5F; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:03:02 -0700 From: Drake Wyrm To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi Message-ID: <20060423010302.GA26452@phaenix.haell.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20060422145220.GA16068@osgiliath> <20060422193653.GA19581@phaenix.haell.com> <20060422202328.GC17673@osgiliath> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060422202328.GC17673@osgiliath> X-Arch: athlon_tbird-gentoo-linux-gnu X-Fnord: There is no conspiracy X-Fortune: There *__is* no such thing as a civil engineer. X-Losrios-Magic: ban28guec8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 320073e2-c38c-430e-9ab5-b025e57c407c X-Archives-Hash: 813be870857439338fc7df7fd38ebd79 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: > > Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the > > next few weeks? >=20 > What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile > against linux-2.4.x anyways. That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My apologies. I should have looked for that before responding. Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to 2.6.10, I'm going to speculate that the arm, sparc, and s390 crowds are not so interested in that particular module. --=20 I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish. -- Rita Mae Brown --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkRK0kYACgkQQWVmeKdhp/IWbwCeM6V5McOSXbTPtlEfYozJ/apv bJYAn0q8HjywX8Ig/t621TuWpwL2rJZc =HfOX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list