From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FUpSH-0004Wy-3S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:25:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3FIPHX0018013; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:25:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3FINQaf025227 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:23:27 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FUpQc-0004Zz-Bq for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:23:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 5331 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2006 14:05:22 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2006 14:05:22 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:24:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060415044904.GD18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> <1145098556.17585.2.camel@rivendell> <20060415160734.GE18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20060415160734.GE18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> GEOMAN: IS A RETARD Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604151424.02003.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f231e7cd-3070-40b5-89c1-117971e4e606 X-Archives-Hash: 47ad1041621bb974380c0f08dc74dfd6 On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:07, Mark Loeser wrote: > I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained, > and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one > if there isn't anyone to claim responsibility for the package when there > is a problem. and it helps no one to go around cutting packages that have no outstanding issues with them there was an outstanding issue with cccc, but i resolved that -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list