From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FSvo3-0001y1-TG
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:47:48 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3AClfsn018112;
	Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:47:41 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3ACinOK029496
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:44:49 GMT
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FSvlB-00057P-7q
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:44:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 20674 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2006 08:28:25 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 10 Apr 2006 08:28:25 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:44:49 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <20060410032627.E70DC85C00E@caddie.localnet> <200604101012.29117.pauldv@gentoo.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604100418290.16429@rutrow.coat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604100418290.16429@rutrow.coat.com>
GEOMAN: IS A RETARD
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200604100844.49667.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: e65ad907-9ea1-4bb4-9998-1d57f1017319
X-Archives-Hash: aad8bae88721ad58399d0da9499c6acd

On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> >> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
> >
> > Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the
> > package in one place only.
>
> Because you can't cut-n-paste the url when editing the ebuild.

eh ?  a sourceforge SRC_URI that uses $PN can easily be cut & paste ...
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list