public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving Gentoo User Relations
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:15:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060407171514.261764cf@eusebe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060407102154.4690b806@snowdrop.home>

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:21:54 +0100,
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:

> * If we're looking to increase the flow of end users -> super users ->
> developers, perhaps we should focus more upon improving development
> tools or development documentation.

I would also suggest creation of a gentoo-dev-help@ mailing-list.
Something similar to what, i guess, the homonym IRC chan is, but for
people who don't like IRC.  Maybe i'm wrong and that's not the
intention, but after 4 years of reading on gentoo-dev@ (yeah, today is
anniversary of my subscription - yik, that's more than 36K emails in
this maildir) , my feeling is that it's not the right place for users
to ask technical questions about development/contributing (ebuilds
writing, etc.).  It's not that i fear this ML, but i see it mainly as a
place for dev-to-dev communication on general/important topics (gleps
discussion, common sense reminders, random flamewars, etc.), and thus i
see the occasional "How {c,sh}ould i do something?" messages about
small details as somehow off-topic, and i tend to avoid posting some.

Seeing how more numerous this kind of messages are on "Portage &
Programming" forums, or on gentoo-user*@ lists, i guess i'm not the
only user with such feeling.  But forums or users MLs are not really
satisfactory for non-obvious questions, because the devs/users rate
there is too low.

So, what i usualy do when i'm not sure about something, in an ebuild i
wrote for instance, is to post  it as-is on bugs.g.o, with the
questions left open in my report. But they will stay unanswered if
the bug falls in the "maintainer-wanted@" oubliettes, or if the
assignee is too short in time to explain me why he choosed one solution
rather than an other. And even if i get my answer, it will be from a
single dev, whereas others might have had a different views on the
topic.

Finally, i think such a mainling list could give good hints on what to
improve in the documentation. Some legitimate questions may point to
real lacks in the documentation, and some answers could be starting
point for new chunks to add to the official or unofficial handbooks.

--
TGL.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-07 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-07  2:30 [gentoo-dev] Improving Gentoo User Relations Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07  2:17 ` [gentoo-dev] How many users? [WAS] " Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-07  3:22   ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07  8:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christopher O'Neill
2006-04-07  9:07   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07  9:33     ` Grobian
2006-04-07  9:49       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 11:32       ` Patrick Lauer
2006-04-07 14:24         ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-11 20:55         ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-07 14:22       ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 14:19     ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:35       ` Martin Ehmsen
2006-04-07 14:45         ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:43       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 14:57         ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-08 19:29     ` lnxg33k
2006-04-07  9:33   ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-07  9:56     ` Jakub Moc
2006-04-15  8:45       ` Philipp Riegger
2006-04-07 10:37     ` Jonathan Coome
2006-04-07 14:27       ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-08 21:55       ` Tom Wesley
2006-04-07 14:26     ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:20   ` Grant Goodyear
2006-04-07 14:47     ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-15  9:10       ` Philipp Riegger
2006-04-07 13:51   ` Duncan
2006-04-07 14:14   ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07  9:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 14:41   ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 15:15   ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour [this message]
2006-04-07 15:42     ` Alec Warner
2006-04-07 15:47       ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 17:01         ` Alexandre Buisse
2006-04-08 15:12         ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-08 19:15       ` lnxg33k
2006-04-07 16:48     ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-07 17:47       ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2006-04-08 19:07   ` lnxg33k
2006-04-08 22:27     ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 11:32 ` Thomas Cort
2006-04-07 14:43   ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-17  8:34 ` Volkov Peter
2006-04-17 19:05   ` Curtis Napier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060407171514.261764cf@eusebe \
    --to=degrenier@easyconnect.fr \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox