From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQsXb-0001an-UE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:54:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k34Ks5tM032241; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:54:05 GMT Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k34Kq4rU027977 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:52:04 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k34Kq4lC029988 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 22:52:04 +0200 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442610050 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 22:52:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 22:52:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200604040216.08925.karimarie@mail.rit.edu> <4431D9E8.8030904@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4431D9E8.8030904@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2468869.4nWRRqg033"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200604042252.04193.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e960cd54-af25-49c3-a265-5faf3fdb9bd1 X-Archives-Hash: 993d619e0d3336e3d91a70dbf0aac34c --nextPart2468869.4nWRRqg033 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 04 April 2006 04:28, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Kari Hazzard wrote: > > This is Gentoo. We have a reputation of good community support to > > maintain here. You're not helping that reputation by being mean to peop= le > > who ask legitimate questions. The issue that the question may have been > > sent to the wrong list is irrelevant. RTFM is never the right answer to= a > > question. > > I fail to see how pointing out a post was offtopic is mean. Rather, it > will save that individual (and hopefully others) from making the same > mistake in the future. > > Also, RTFM is absolutely the right answer more often than not. > Otherwise, what is the point of having TFM in the first place? The > amusement of those who spent a lot of time and effort writing it? Don't reply with RTFM, but with something like: =2D------------ template ------------- Hi sender, This is explained far better than I could do here in=20 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/foobar.xml If you have further questions, feel free to ask. Regards, your friendly gentoo developer. =2D------------ end template ------------- Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2468869.4nWRRqg033 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEMtx0bKx5DBjWFdsRAlgOAKCB+xw7IvOfyMWDGp/HyhnMiZoezgCgoK3T 3GoV6ao+zMsbxkuLt338to4= =Mxty -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2468869.4nWRRqg033-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list