From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1FQdVi-00071y-Rg
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 04:51:23 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k344oXrC009372;
Tue, 4 Apr 2006 04:50:33 GMT
Received: from outbound2-new.mail.tds.net (outbound2-new.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.85])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k344mTuo032045
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 04:48:30 GMT
Received: from outaamta02.mail.tds.net (outaamta02.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.32])
by outbound2-new.mail.tds.net (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k344m9xK017689
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:48:19 -0500
Received: from cerberus.oppresses.us ([69.21.248.29])
by outaamta02.mail.tds.net with ESMTP
id <20060404044806.HBPN12877.outaamta02.mail.tds.net@cerberus.oppresses.us>
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:48:06 -0500
Received: by cerberus.oppresses.us (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 548ED4AE94; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:48:03 -0400
From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct
Message-ID: <20060404044803.GA19711@cerberus.oppresses.us>
References: <200604031738.48509.vapier@gentoo.org> <200604040140.59589.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20060403234438.GA13737@cerberus.oppresses.us> <4431B96C.2060009@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4431B96C.2060009@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k344mTuo032045
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k344oXss009372
X-Archives-Salt: 4d0626a2-271e-48e2-b636-a3c62aca1309
X-Archives-Hash: 62fa9efe49a69278ef3b39d90b5db970
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:10:20AM +0200, Jan Kundr=E1t wrote:
> Jon Portnoy wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:40:59AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> >=20
> >>This is how it has been handled so far except in the ciaranm incident=
. This is=20
> >>how I personally think this should be handled in future.
> >>
> >=20
> >=20
> > Well, quite frankly devrel has never fallen down on the job quite so=20
> > often & so hard before handling this particular incident. I don't thi=
nk=20
> > it's so unreasonable to have backup plans for preserving Gentoo when=20
> > devrel cannot respond in a timely manner
>=20
> Come on, this is FUD. Devrel had had a plenty of time to make an action
> *and* to talk to infra in the recent case. They had decided *not* to do
> that - which means that they didn't consider it apropriate, IMHO.
>=20
> Or am I really missing something obvious?
>=20
My point is that when devrel breaks infra has to pick up the pieces,=20
thus it makes sense for them to have that angle covered.
--=20
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--=20
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list