From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQYHh-0000KL-Ck for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:16:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k33NGK51013404; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:16:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k33NEC3H007466 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 23:14:13 GMT Received: from [151.56.15.244] (helo=enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FQYFP-0007Fu-0x for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:14:12 +0000 From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 01:13:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2950572.H7iS6kaOWW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200604040114.01418@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7dd6fd7e-b66d-40b6-aa3f-80660e2948ce X-Archives-Hash: 265885a3f06068702b258abf2b31d87f --nextPart2950572.H7iS6kaOWW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:05, m h wrote: > This isn't meant as flamebait. =A0I'm running stable on my laptop and > unstable on my desktop. =A0It seems like most KDE release get better > over time, so I'm just wondering what the process is with KDE? KDE 3.5.0 was quite broken -and required more patches than usual to get to = an=20 usable state-, KDE 3.5.1 was a bit better but stills some patches were=20 needed, KDE 3.5.2 is in portage since less than a month, and already had a= =20 few patches with revbumps to few memleaks and crashes, a new kdelibs revbum= p=20 is also planned, and umbrello 3.5.2 is regressed compared to 3.5.1 (that=20 still, vanilla, wasn't usable for activity diagrams at all). That said, I doubt we can have anything stable in less that another month o= r=20 even two. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart2950572.H7iS6kaOWW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBEMaw5e2h1+2mHVWMRApJ2AJUXu1y+pdAhAJT3L0V8NWUsG1BJAJ4o8EfK /dyz0MZI9jYZZI8nXQPrDQ== =G7nN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2950572.H7iS6kaOWW-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list