On Sunday 02 April 2006 04:48, Daniel Goller wrote:
> exactly, what's the point of removing it so fast? give people a chance
> to miss it, it does not matter if it's removed or masked only as far as
> going "woah, what?" and if masked it is a matter of unmasking rather
> than recommitting

We haven't had a single issue with the usual seven day period as far as I can 
remember, so please come up with a valid argument against it, instead 
assuming turning my argument would be one.

> in short, if it's slowing down the process, why do you need it to be
> quick in the first place?

Getting the junk out of tree and mind as fast as possible is a value in 
itself.


Carsten