public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 19:18:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604011918.25444.carlo@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060329235516.GM13186@aerie.halcy0n.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]

On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:55, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Not directed specifically at you, but it seems a lot of people are
> masking stuff and removing it very quickly, and I'd really like to see
> everyone wait the 30 days to remove something from the tree.  That way
> anyone using this package in some way will get the message from p.mask,
> and know what they should upgrade to.
>
> With that being said, is there any reason that the package should be
> removed so quickly?

Yes, there is. It's slowing down the process, getting into the flow. Waiting 
30 days is a lot of time. A regular user does not necessarily follow the 
dev-gentoo mailing list and it doesn't matter for him, if the package is 
masked or removed. He can always get it from (web-)cvs. The time to wait is 
to give others the time to step up to maintain the package. And if some dev 
missed the announcement, nothing is stopping him to reintroduce the it. 
Honestly, I don't see the point.


Carsten

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 200 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-01 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-29 10:06 [gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi foser
2006-03-29 23:55 ` Mark Loeser
2006-03-30 17:05   ` [gentoo-dev] up for removal timeframe foser
2006-04-01 17:18   ` Carsten Lohrke [this message]
2006-04-02  2:48     ` [gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi Daniel Goller
2006-04-02 19:20       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-02 19:31         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-02 20:20           ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-02 20:29             ` Simon Stelling
2006-04-02 21:23               ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-02 21:42                 ` Marcelo Góes
2006-04-02 21:56                   ` Andrej Kacian
2006-04-02 23:48                 ` Alexander Gretencord
2006-04-03 11:21                 ` Simon Stelling
2006-04-03 11:27                   ` Simon Stelling
2006-04-03 14:41                 ` Jan Kundrát
2006-04-03 16:17                   ` Jan Kundrát
2006-04-02 20:33             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-02 21:18               ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-02 21:26                 ` Jakub Moc
2006-04-02 22:15                   ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-03  2:29         ` Daniel Goller
2006-04-02  3:52     ` Mark Loeser
2006-04-02 19:04       ` Alexander Gretencord
2006-04-02 19:12         ` Jan Kundrát
2006-04-02 23:36           ` Alexander Gretencord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200604011918.25444.carlo@gentoo.org \
    --to=carlo@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox