From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FOAUF-00082k-2Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:27:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2S9REuO004701; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:27:14 GMT Received: from psmtp01.wxs.nl (psmtp01-real.wxs.nl [195.121.247.14]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2S9PHwW020507 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:25:17 GMT Received: from pavlvs2.devrieze.net (ip5457f303.direct-adsl.nl [84.87.243.3]) by psmtp01.wxs.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2S9PGkh029890 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:25:16 +0200 Received: from hex.local.devrieze.net (hex.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.7]) by pavlvs2.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5610050 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:25:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:25:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <200603271029.35816.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200603272258.07384.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200603272258.07384.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2522988.pQ5tvi5Iv8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603281125.16062.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 97142387-510c-4496-bd40-30d4c0caaf71 X-Archives-Hash: a250acb5acbe2388700bf673619667ff --nextPart2522988.pQ5tvi5Iv8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 27 March 2006 22:58, Dan Armak wrote: > This thread [1] from subversion-users asked about update/checkout > performance. The svn people answered that performance usually isn't > constrained by reassembly time. Moreover, the older BDB repo format stores > the complete latest revision, and checkouts aren't significantly faster > than from FSFS. That's interesting. If possible I think that a fsfs repository should be us= ed.=20 BDB repositories are too fragile in respect to berkeley db. Of course we should perhaps just try things out. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2522988.pQ5tvi5Iv8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEKQD8bKx5DBjWFdsRAuv7AJ9gQ3Zz06URCj+f6YMdUcV5h+jwZwCeIYoD d7vctWMHUaJYIHr39hELVw0= =JAp/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2522988.pQ5tvi5Iv8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list