From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FNkZF-00070V-KQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:47:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2R5k6L7010408; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:46:06 GMT Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.200.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2R5hsVc011001 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:43:55 GMT Received: from trolocsis.dyndns.org ([24.4.231.48]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006032705435401300ec9hue>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:43:54 +0000 Received: by trolocsis.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58048D4056; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:43:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:43:53 -0800 From: Ryan Phillips To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Ryan Phillips , agriffis@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Message-ID: <20060327054353.GA9018@trolocsis.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ryan Phillips , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, agriffis@gentoo.org References: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <200603241506.54915.dostrow@gentoo.org> <20060325064751.GA8104@trolocsis.dyndns.org> <20060325230048.GA2691@olive.flatmonk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060325230048.GA2691@olive.flatmonk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 271c25c0-cc2d-43d3-8432-fa52fc256703 X-Archives-Hash: 735775c5da6c4dd5062a6dd6edfe88f5 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Aron Griffis said: > Have you followed the threads in the past regarding using other > version control systems for portage? Some devs have done benchmarks > and found that there are blocking issues with subversion, particularly > because of its repo-wide revisions that prevent multiple commits from > happening simultaneously. In actuality, Subversion does 98% of the commit in an initial transaction, and the blocking only occurs in the last 2% with the FSFS filesystem. It really isn't an issue and shouldn't prevent us from adopting it. -ryan --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJ3uZ6cLeDQrpxL8RAs+BAJsETX/RpRVhzZQrX5U0Uc6m+b3M/wCdH4+z 4jtTFBR5lML3HR5OZH8q0Bk= =9mxf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list