From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FN8ix-00007l-R4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:22:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2PDM15C005485; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:22:01 GMT Received: from mail-relay-2.tiscali.it (mail-relay-2.tiscali.it [213.205.33.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2PDK5uu013115 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:20:05 GMT Received: from c1358217.kevquinn.com (84.222.87.21) by mail-relay-2.tiscali.it (7.2.069.1) id 4382FB7B00FF2C7A for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:20:05 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:28:24 +0100 From: "Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Message-ID: <20060325142824.37e46105@c1358217.kevquinn.com> In-Reply-To: <1143290265.31765.21.camel@localhost> References: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <200603241506.54915.dostrow@gentoo.org> <200603250331.35152@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060325124244.509f0f18@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <1143287218.31765.12.camel@localhost> <20060325133204.5f6b73ee@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <1143290265.31765.21.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_ZIG3/L=29nT6rxUAsUHehi/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 5a48402e-4a5e-465a-b89d-71f8b5b58315 X-Archives-Hash: 566ecd8749f2e41a117c95eb91e7fb98 --Sig_ZIG3/L=29nT6rxUAsUHehi/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:37:45 +0000 Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 13:32 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:46:58 +0000 > > Duncan Coutts wrote: > >=20 > > > On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:42 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > > >=20 > > > > This is a valid issue, as ghc is only supplied upstream for > > > > linux (some older versions available in mingw32). > > >=20 > > > I don't think this is right. All the recent ghc versions have been > > > supplied upstream on many OSs including installers for win32 and > > > OSX. The OpenBSD, FreeBSD & Darwin ports systems include ghc. > >=20 > > Sorry, yes - I looked at the snapshot download pages where it's > > linux and mingw32) instead of the release download pages (where > > it's linux x86, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 and windows, FreeBSD x86, > > OpenBSD x86, MacOS X and AIX). > >=20 > > However the issue still remains for non-x86/ppc platforms; sparc in > > particular is likely to be used as a dev platform by some. >=20 > I use ghc and darcs on my sparc box all the time. ghc-6.4.1-r2 is > currently marked stable on sparc. darcs is currently marked ~sparc. Ahem. Sorry again - I still didn't look at the right page! http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_641.html lists sparc, hppa, and also alpha, m68k & s390 on debian. > I'm currently working on ghc for ia64 since Aron Griffis was > interested in using darcs on ia64. It's looking good so far. >=20 > As Flameeyes pointed out our main problem is with the various > Gentoo/ALT systems where we don't have quite enough developer time to > allow ghc to get near the top of the TODO list (though we do have it > working with ppc osx). >=20 --=20 Kevin F. Quinn --Sig_ZIG3/L=29nT6rxUAsUHehi/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJUV89G2S8dekcG0RAn0sAKCRPsIRHJ9JYPLQZ7d0AQkpSVmTewCeNDpm zKxGhc5YxJlSDmYLJ4nGoI4= =5dWu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ZIG3/L=29nT6rxUAsUHehi/-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list