From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FMsTZ-0003rV-TO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:01:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2OJxaLj014272; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:59:36 GMT Received: from outbound4.mail.tds.net (outbound4.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.94]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2OJsvXT010149 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:54:57 GMT Received: from outaamta01.mail.tds.net (outaamta01.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.31]) by outbound4.mail.tds.net (8.13.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k2OJsu5X002168 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:54:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from piment.flatmonk ([69.21.248.222]) by outaamta01.mail.tds.net with ESMTP id <20060324195456.KUYX25920.outaamta01.mail.tds.net@piment.flatmonk> for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:54:56 -0600 Received: from olive.flatmonk (olive [10.0.0.11]) by piment.flatmonk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FECBA467A for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:54:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by olive.flatmonk (Postfix, from userid 10208) id 9BAAD5250C0; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:54:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:54:53 -0500 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Message-ID: <20060324195452.GB5590@olive.flatmonk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ Errors-To: aron@griffis1.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 3628f9ae-bace-4817-ae3d-353c74af420d X-Archives-Hash: 9f2188462968e2ccfcaa8fe3e904e1de --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Grant Goodyear wrote: [Fri Mar 24 2006, 02:35:34PM EST] > After reading through that fairly lengthy thread, I'm afraid that I can > no longer tell exactly what is being proposed. Who has read access? > Who has write access? Bugs are handled where, and by whom? Are we > considering a fairly tightly controlled system, or a wild free-for-all? > Exactly which problem are we proposing to solve here? >=20 > If someone could succinctly summarize the current schools of thought, > I'd be quite indebted. I'll chime in, but with an additional request rather than a response. Stuart said something about this not needing a GLEP, and maybe it doesn't, but personally I'd rather see it go that route. Writing a GLEP formalizes the answers to these questions and helps to put us all on the same page. Aron --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJE6MJrHF4yAQTrARAlE9AJ43bWL8ormmpuCYzN7m621LySBaQQCguZiZ Qgewz1m6kEcbdOd6F6kSq/8= =rHkI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list