From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FMs8n-0001uU-1i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:40:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2OJdAx1022812; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:39:10 GMT Received: from smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2OJZaux029830 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:35:37 GMT Received: (qmail 4287 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 19:35:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.grantgoodyear.org) (s?robertson@sbcglobal.net@67.67.81.246 with plain) by smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 19:35:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (dst [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.grantgoodyear.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2OJZZsK023826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:35:35 -0600 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:35:34 -0600 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? Message-ID: <20060324193534.GA24818@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) X-Archives-Salt: b339f0d7-8348-4add-844e-85ce9916d396 X-Archives-Hash: 68206026ae7ad7e7e61a16d2e8baa2ab --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline After reading through that fairly lengthy thread, I'm afraid that I can no longer tell exactly what is being proposed. Who has read access? Who has write access? Bugs are handled where, and by whom? Are we considering a fairly tightly controlled system, or a wild free-for-all? Exactly which problem are we proposing to solve here? If someone could succinctly summarize the current schools of thought, I'd be quite indebted. Thanks, g2boojum --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJEoGptxxUuD2W3YRAs4yAJ97gMom3NfXmVTMRe7DQ1+DLyZMewCeJzE6 vQd5mzeWmLUzC7K+BbHJ7q4= =ll40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list