From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FMi6E-0006AL-Gy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:56:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2O8tt42018244; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:55:55 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2O8qVdV010671 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:52:31 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3463E2E820C for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:52:31 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sandboxes Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:52:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <44233322.2040801@gentoo.org> <3b09e8e90603231654h2e3ec018q22ee4c3ee265324f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3b09e8e90603231654h2e3ec018q22ee4c3ee265324f@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2663876.GYRgVoFqUg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603240952.30952.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c3c8a0c0-fa38-4fb6-a142-6d5aadcc444c X-Archives-Hash: 837f34d032a1640fd5067ff2738e4357 --nextPart2663876.GYRgVoFqUg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 24 March 2006 01:54, Thomas Cort wrote: > > Thoughts on ideas on this somewhat more focussed idea? ( or at least > > I think it's more focused :P ) > > Will there be restrictions on what can go into these overlays? There > are some ebuilds that aren't allowed in the main portage tree. One > example is winex-cvs (see > app-emulation/winex-cvs/winex-cvs-3000.ebuild for details). Another > example... an overlay dev could take an existing ebuild that has > RESTRICT=3D"fetch" and modify it to fetch the package directly without > user interaction. Things that are not suited for public consumption should not be made=20 public in the first place. This is one reason that I don't think that=20 users should be given the opportunity to create their own gentoo-hosed=20 overlays. I believe that developers could be trusted though to do things=20 properly. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2663876.GYRgVoFqUg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEI7NObKx5DBjWFdsRAj+xAKCqy0e1aKrhIgzf7jxv54Z7T2lE2gCZAfMN OSpVygP2ddE54FPmxHp/nnY= =+J/s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2663876.GYRgVoFqUg-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list