From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FMiqf-0007Yg-Dk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:44:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2O9iI4L011086; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:44:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2O9gHfA009598 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:42:17 GMT Received: from 83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.33.139] helo=osgiliath.brixandersen.dk) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FMioC-0007oT-OR for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:42:16 +0000 Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B62CF1FAE4; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:42:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:42:14 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sandboxes Message-ID: <20060324094214.GA30689@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <44233322.2040801@gentoo.org> <3b09e8e90603231654h2e3ec018q22ee4c3ee265324f@mail.gmail.com> <200603240952.30952.pauldv@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603240952.30952.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: f32e5729-20e5-4e25-95ec-121a9b4a8ff3 X-Archives-Hash: 0366a30e15d9de8a6e42ae40569e4f28 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:52:30AM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > Things that are not suited for public consumption should not be made=20 > public in the first place. This is one reason that I don't think that=20 > users should be given the opportunity to create their own gentoo-hosed=20 > overlays. I believe that developers could be trusted though to do things= =20 > properly. I agree. The proposal sounds like a great way of getting more experienced users to contribute to the project, yet it still keeps the broken/illegal/etc ebuilds written by some of our less experienced users non-official (where official =3D hosted on *.gentoo.org). I'm in favor of a overlays.g.o as the companion to planet.g.o with selected users contributin, but I'd hate to see plain end-user overlays hosted on *.gentoo.org. Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFEI772v+Q4flTiePgRAnVWAJoCOoFGZmHljNlX98d+A1YBuIHcuACgmiSJ qR7GGT5NehrdCkpwNSmsWRk= =uBua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list