From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FHNMl-0000rL-Fp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:47:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k29FkXHf018069; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:46:33 GMT Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.206]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k29FgC24002160 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:42:13 GMT Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m2so240800uge for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:42:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=gv+3QvfLXsLF6uhrMmCGZ2DpOa4Kmo8SHiYoh5vKAdoXQGwnHgBGLDzbPd/fDRrk/5dI3MMP3LZ6MpEtvhu31XmPrpm+XA67CslkIEAFHaSb8K8GBHXszrX9zgRzBMIgqQ6w5QjaP40UFKZwfLB2whHT961PKdV68nNyg4pDWXs= Received: by 10.66.245.7 with SMTP id s7mr1240922ugh; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.66.253]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q40sm1867692ugc.2006.03.09.07.42.11; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:42:12 -0800 (PST) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x86-fbsd keyword in main tree? Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:42:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603091529.24493@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <441047C1.1020102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <441047C1.1020102@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2293063.sWRr3RlRh2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603091642.09716@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 0bc468f7-3c20-4db9-8e4e-ae8dcc467d52 X-Archives-Hash: 44a263118e9d6ad5de9573820061cc0b --nextPart2293063.sWRr3RlRh2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:20, Alec Warner wrote: > Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so x86-fbsd has=20 > ARCH x86, and would get "x86" in use, which IMHO, isn't that horrible ). Right now ARCH=3Dx86-fbsd for G/FBSD, as spb already said, so it's not much= of=20 the problem. If that will change, it will with GLEP47 anyway, so that's not either a=20 particular problem. > Whatever the fix is we should be able to make a 2.0.54-r1 release with > it, still need to talk to Zac, if anyone has any comments on this, now > would be the time ;) Not like we're going to use 2.0.54 as it's mostly broken for Gentoo/FreeBSD= =2E..=20 right now we need 2.1, and there will probably be more things to fix in the= =20 future, so... =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart2293063.sWRr3RlRh2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEEEzRe2h1+2mHVWMRAkpiAKD21qXV7egycMahULv8HiupiWzPCwCfQtem Ld193qP3ItwQdFGfwC6C7zY= =s0s3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2293063.sWRr3RlRh2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list