From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FHNKY-0003Xc-P7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:45:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k29FhasW026163; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:43:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k29Fe2lG006183 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:40:02 GMT Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FHNFB-00044r-PI for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:40:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:44:51 +0000 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x86-fbsd keyword in main tree? Message-ID: <20060309154451.5e919362@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200603091529.24493@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200603091529.24493@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k29FhauC026163 X-Archives-Salt: ea32dcf1-a4c2-4396-a410-12b2dbb8d73e X-Archives-Hash: aabc60e03af2aa0824f88de2c80d1ddb On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:29:23 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2" wrote: > To bring ~x86-fbsd keywording in main tree, we mainly need to move a > true profile in the tree, not a dummy one, mark it as indev and start > the keywording. (I've already cleaned up the default-bsd/fbsd profile > so that it does work with the current base/ profile. > As long as virtual/libc is not in the dependencies, it shouldn't > trigger any kind of problems to leave the sys-freebsd category in the > overlay, if we really need to start needing that, I'll see to make > the ebuild quality level. My main objection here is "If it's worth doing, it's worth doing properly." I'd rather see the keywords and system ebuilds merged at the same time, so we don't end up with some half-system that has keywords in the tree but can't be installed. > It's not going to be a quick thing, as I'm mostly alone with > Gentoo/FreeBSD right now (help is always welcome), but times are > mature so that I can provide a decent experience to users. >=20 > Can anybody name a showstopper to this? As far as I'm concerned the main reason this has been almost exclusively in overlay for so long is that we can rework things much more easily without worrying about breaking backwards compatibility or upgrade paths. If it's in a state where that's not likely to be an issue any more then I'd be in favour of merging it, as long it's done right. That in itself will of course be a non-trivial task, but I can awake from my BSD-related hibernation to get it done if it's reckoned to be a good idea and unlikely to break anything.=20 On the other hand, I don't want to do this if there are serious objections from other devs, so any opinions from outside gentoo-alt are welcome. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list