From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEDBP-0008JM-Iq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:19:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SMGEuW007019; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:16:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SMBXnO013042 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:11:34 GMT Received: from rl03 by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FED4m-0003Zz-V7 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:12 +0000 From: Renat Lumpau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228221212.GN11818@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org> <905929917.20060228220239@gentoo.org> <200602281631.37594.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org> <20060228215705.515476e7@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ztcJpsdPpsnnlAp8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060228215705.515476e7@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: ac937f79-1649-4d0b-9431-d8384c81e387 X-Archives-Hash: f84c8997ee3400b1be8d331182072491 --ztcJpsdPpsnnlAp8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:57:05PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:50:40 +0000 Renat Lumpau wrote: > | On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > | > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when > | > a user files a report at bugs.gentoo.org > |=20 > | I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to > | figure out which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA > | team member's opinion (personal attacks, whatever) should be an > | important input but not the final say. >=20 > Important QA issues are, first and foremost, the ones that can be > detected and fixed quickly. You mean like whitespace and syntax that affects noone? --=20 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA America - land of the free* *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c. --ztcJpsdPpsnnlAp8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBMq8EzitwsaoONoRAmjrAJ45HoyYig1nYv8xIDsSC5YqG3FTUACdHPRh 3nqBNdUOlmjcttYO763T8KI= =uOmi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ztcJpsdPpsnnlAp8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list