From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FECyB-0004WZ-3e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:05:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SM1MZl006166; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:01:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SLucOV021772 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:56:38 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FECqM-0006hV-5d for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:57:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FECqG-0005hq-4j for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:57:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:57:05 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228215705.515476e7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org> <905929917.20060228220239@gentoo.org> <200602281631.37594.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/4ObkOO_LzjSGSvTX3uBk.c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4cfb443d-a974-447c-b0a0-88e95e5fb2fc X-Archives-Hash: 3d2b937abc2a69c9b73fc9baf6cbcd69 --Sig_/4ObkOO_LzjSGSvTX3uBk.c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:50:40 +0000 Renat Lumpau wrote: | On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: | > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when | > a user files a report at bugs.gentoo.org |=20 | I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to | figure out which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA | team member's opinion (personal attacks, whatever) should be an | important input but not the final say. Important QA issues are, first and foremost, the ones that can be detected and fixed quickly. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_/4ObkOO_LzjSGSvTX3uBk.c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBMc396zL6DUtXhERAvO/AKDDrhSFV2CjkiCCPrut1kcxRwAYBACfX65+ +QA8WVA8QhN/65My5oIGefA= =LeoA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4ObkOO_LzjSGSvTX3uBk.c-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list