From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBNr-0001IB-DL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:23:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SKMCYY008182; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:22:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SKJmdM004808 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:19:48 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBKi-0006n2-Cs for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBKZ-0004un-Ob for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:23 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:20:20 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228202020.54f297ba@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <661276105.20060228200902@gentoo.org> References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <1140997703.12229.166.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227003413.GE17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060227170834.075e9388@snowdrop.home> <1141071970.804.19.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227203709.2a7bff47@snowdrop.home> <1159375278.20060227214923@gentoo.org> <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org> <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> <1141139552.2741.2.camel@localhost> <7310506941.20060228162637@gentoo.org> <20060228154246.3e34d340@snowdrop.home> <1141143118.2741.18.camel@localhost> <20060228163532.273200be@snowdrop.home> <1232307950.20060228180003@gentoo.org> <20060228170954.37396045@snowdrop.home> <16410671399.20060228183024@gentoo.org> <20060228173810.3e209be2@snowdrop.home> <661276105.20060228200902@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_YdwACZAfT=krT=iyoWsU_ye"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 10f6c768-2242-4ee8-857b-afa1c6ef48c8 X-Archives-Hash: 0918fee19c8d3cee50590e9231649d3d --Sig_YdwACZAfT=krT=iyoWsU_ye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:09:02 +0100 Jakub Moc wrote: | 28.2.2006, 18:38:10, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Sheesh, you'll probably claim that this isn't broken next too: |=20 | > if [ "${IS_UPGRADE}" =3D "1" ] ; then | > einfo "Removing old version ${REMOVE_PKG}" |=20 | > emerge -C "${REMOVE_PKG}" | > fi |=20 | No, I won't claim that... I'd rather love to know why didn't you | point out to an obvious eclass flaw about 30 emails and many hours | ago, saving us from all the eclass formating, slotting and ewarn | blurb. Why didn't you look before accusing me of not having valid issues? I mean, it's pretty frickin' hard to miss that one. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_YdwACZAfT=krT=iyoWsU_ye Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBLCH96zL6DUtXhERApgLAJ9+P46cOfRChRYT6FJtdcB4MzNwRACdFxNP 7B+7d5egcDpfzRzzMWagtNI= =psO2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_YdwACZAfT=krT=iyoWsU_ye-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list