From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE89B-0000oH-JT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:56:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SGq2LU020472; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:52:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SGdfHq018671 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:39:41 GMT Received: from rl03 by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FE7tu-0005S1-5o for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:40:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:40:38 +0000 From: Renat Lumpau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228164038.GA11818@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <1141071970.804.19.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227203709.2a7bff47@snowdrop.home> <1159375278.20060227214923@gentoo.org> <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org> <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> <1141139552.2741.2.camel@localhost> <7310506941.20060228162637@gentoo.org> <20060228154246.3e34d340@snowdrop.home> <1141143118.2741.18.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1141143118.2741.18.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: df4087fe-c398-4407-8591-0ebab34f8a0f X-Archives-Hash: 0647eb8f25df00abab37e16fd5b3ce12 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:11:58PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Ok, sorry for being dumb :-) > What exactly is the issue there? I don't see the issue in setting SLOT > depending on ... uhm ... some variable. Looks kinda logical at first > glance, but I'm not aware of the issues it causes. One issue here is that security revbumps are no longer effective in that the vulnerable version remains installed and must be unmerged manually by the sysadmin. I started a discussion about this very same issue yesterday on -web-user and we hope to resolve it shortly. --=20 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA America - land of the free* *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c. --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBH0FEzitwsaoONoRAiNcAJ9RNEF0Hqt82X9SgNoa69It3NvKCACfYUzq LhfAvNunuInsSWKPzLY3xrc= =Okhd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list