From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE6j9-0007bB-JB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:25:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SFMH9T003600; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:22:17 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SFGKVJ004738 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:16:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5012E8216 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:17:20 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:17:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org> <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1293820.Jj3ptN7iJn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602281617.20416.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5bee33c7-efc3-4147-a61f-7fe61a7dc6ff X-Archives-Hash: ce61430ba5c5f4234ac3688f5db24d65 --nextPart1293820.Jj3ptN7iJn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting > a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I > have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent > elsewhere. Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general and=20 assurance in particular? This is something that repoman might check for,=20 and issue a warning. It has nothing to do with end-user quality. It even=20 is no problem for developers trying to understand the ebuild. It is only=20 a coding style violation, not a QA violation. Coding style is to present=20 a uniform view to things, so things look proper. QA is about things being=20 proper, not looking proper. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1293820.Jj3ptN7iJn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEBGmAbKx5DBjWFdsRAsJHAKCadubDca9LOlu18Tios+3X2NXZcACfZJZS +JEOUjQ8xGimETlXY7GEpgE= =a8wX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1293820.Jj3ptN7iJn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list