From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE7Tg-0007VD-AZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:13:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SFxGW3009139; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:59:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SFhCkV030110 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:44:06 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FE6p6-0000zn-3f for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:31:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE6p0-0003F6-KI for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:31:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:31:26 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228153126.44c0a0e1@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200602281617.20416.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org> <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> <200602281617.20416.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_Q/+0JxRFnVxwAYZG1xWtD5_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e1d2105c-b227-4e1b-8b93-957d1235bfad X-Archives-Hash: 394209528769ab7a0f132dca19d144f2 --Sig_Q/+0JxRFnVxwAYZG1xWtD5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:17:20 +0100 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. | > Getting a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot | > longer, and I have yet to be convinced that my time would not be | > better spent elsewhere. |=20 | Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general | and assurance in particular? It's more relevant than you might think. Screwing up layout like that breaks various QA checking tools that assume that things are in the standard format. | QA is about things being proper, not looking proper. Proper coding style is part of being proper. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_Q/+0JxRFnVxwAYZG1xWtD5_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBGzS96zL6DUtXhERAq6wAJ45bkW104NieaYqvahmuJknIuut6wCgnoPt t4rY/O+3gEk0BjTzSZPggnw= =dvlD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_Q/+0JxRFnVxwAYZG1xWtD5_-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list