From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE6nn-0001Ul-DB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:30:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SFPnF2004458; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:25:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SFKsDW021833 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:20:54 GMT Received: from rl03 by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FE6fj-0008Iz-Dw for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:21:55 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:21:55 +0000 From: Renat Lumpau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060228152155.GA26459@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <1140997703.12229.166.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227003413.GE17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060227170834.075e9388@snowdrop.home> <1141071970.804.19.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227203709.2a7bff47@snowdrop.home> <1159375278.20060227214923@gentoo.org> <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org> <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 10511d39-7571-4e02-92d6-c04e518d1f05 X-Archives-Hash: d7e6709dd55b133480a039eb4e4e3907 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting > a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I > have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent > elsewhere. So let me get this straight.=20 You have been claiming that webapp-config is broken, to put it mildly, for = quite some time (at least several months). Yet as of now, you are unable to tell = us what exactly is wrong. When I asked you on IRC for feedback, you referred m= e to a private conversation with Stuart, which is just as useless as the rest of= your comments. You have not filed a single bug or sent a single email to the maintainers. Your only relevant QA point is a trivial style issue.=20 Your blathering is insulting to the people who actually spend time trying to improve webapp-config. No, it's not perfect. But we want to make it better,= and we have asked you for feedback and got none. You, ciaranm, create measurable deadweight loss. Instead of doing productive work, I waste my time replying to your nonsense. I am fed up and will be ta= king the issue to devrel. --=20 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA America - land of the free* *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c. --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBGqTEzitwsaoONoRAsD2AJkBW50FEZLloggZFwInfNqj+lN2RACeN/Vi CIo+8QR9RDboxkmEcvj6Mn4= =Lzj3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list