From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEB5c-00001L-8o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:04:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SK2eYQ020932; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:02:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SJwVwk018504 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:58:31 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEB09-0006Km-M7 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:59:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 3339 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2006 14:55:49 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 28 Feb 2006 14:55:49 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:59:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <20060228171157.370ebf4b@snowdrop.home> <20060228175137.GG11818@toucan.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20060228175137.GG11818@toucan.gentoo.org> GEOMAN: IS A RETARD Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602281459.42324.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 50d6c121-cf9d-4a0c-aee0-504c05c9e23c X-Archives-Hash: a4550aebba916253c8800a1865771bd0 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:51, Renat Lumpau wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > And it sticks out a nasty ewarn and says that the ebuild is probably > > broken. > > Which it _probably_ is. See, this is a numbers game. In most cases, if you > use the webapp eclass, setting SLOT="0" is incorrect. There are some cases > in which it's just fine. Until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented, how is > the eclass to know what you're trying to do? So it prints a warning and > doesn't die. Number of angry users storming bugs.g.o - 0. why do you need to be a mindreader ? the user requested they control the package, thus it isnt a bug, so dont issue a warning -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list