From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE0cv-00063N-UE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:54:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1S8lNZP029602; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:47:23 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1S8ejhp020312 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:40:55 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDyR2-0008TW-BW for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:34:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 26769 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2006 01:08:05 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 28 Feb 2006 01:08:05 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:11:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060227205445.057a91d9@snowdrop.home> <1141074742.826.35.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> In-Reply-To: <1141074742.826.35.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> GEOMAN: IS A RETARD Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602280111.42007.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 547b556a-7f99-4ae6-9bfd-cd93961063ab X-Archives-Hash: cfc1e5bd3b4c5d84e46093cd4b56f854 On Monday 27 February 2006 16:12, Stuart Herbert wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Whilst that one's still alive, I'm not going to go > > around filing more similar "breaks non-interactively" bugs because the > > discussion will just get repeated over and over. > > This point is another example of an attempt to enforce an undocumented > QA policy the non-interactive rule has never been stated, just hinted at for example, the dev handbook mentions offhand: * Testing the package Please keep in mind the general requirements of an ebuild here. The src_test routine must not be interactive. if you like i can rectify this situation in the Ebuild policy guide -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list