From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmxm-0002mE-Uj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:19:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RIIT9k007402; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:18:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RIGSfM006854 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:29 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmv6-0006j1-Ca for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmv1-0006Lr-C4 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:18 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug #20201 and bbapm Message-ID: <20060227181618.2b66dd28@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <194427272.20060227185413@gentoo.org> References: <440333A1.2030808@gentoo.org> <20060227172309.17c1e7d5@snowdrop.home> <194427272.20060227185413@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_CqLWqLklv1vVe+nFACZFl/K"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4778420a-8cea-4fc4-b38f-b373244c36b4 X-Archives-Hash: 23143f0882a1702f769bee7381727ba2 --Sig_CqLWqLklv1vVe+nFACZFl/K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:13 +0100 Jakub Moc wrote: | *Please*, be so kind and look at metadata.xml for those ebuild, then | just either do it *yourself* or ask someone from your fellow-devs in | commonbox herd to do it for the other ebuilds that you failed to | mention above... Don't move broken stuff on other people's shoulders, | as you've already done once. |=20 | I fail to see why are you claiming here that there's even more broken | stuff in the tree, yet as a member of maintainer herd haven't dealt | with that properly for quite an extensive period of time - and then | you are asking *other* people to do something "properly". Did you read herds.xml yet? Allow me to explain the root of the problem. You're so obsessed with getting that one bug closed that you're not addressing the actual issue, which is that the original bb* demo code was hideously wrong in several places and thus there are a whole load of broken packages in the tree. Closing this one bug off will not, in the grand scheme of things, fix anything. All it will do is give you a false sense of achievement and make me or someone else file yet another "bb* is broken" bug. If you're really looking to help here, solve the problem properly. There is more to it than getting one bug closed. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_CqLWqLklv1vVe+nFACZFl/K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEA0H396zL6DUtXhERApYHAJ9D1IYcld+UQCOV6dQczbSbtfRXgwCfcvwX wSFpusjyC7QKlsJS4TJJbsM= =2mA7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_CqLWqLklv1vVe+nFACZFl/K-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list