From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmv5-0000Fo-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:16:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RIFejV002591; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:15:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RICr7h031787 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:53 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmrd-0003iP-83 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmrY-0006J4-1s for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:48 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:45 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060227181245.5df9a6dd@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200602271221.29343.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060227170834.075e9388@snowdrop.home> <200602271221.29343.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_M=SuHjaVB6qkzdkb_4S6HJk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a1559b37-d45e-4de3-bbb6-f0a34293a85e X-Archives-Hash: 0cefe1613a2844ac816f4bd573812500 --Sig_M=SuHjaVB6qkzdkb_4S6HJk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:21:29 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: | if something is going to lead to "considerable damage" and the | maintainer is unwilling to resolve the issue, then i'm pretty sure | there's more to be resolved here than fixing a package Sure. There're other parts of the document that address that. Getting the issue fixed, however, has higher priority than any disciplinary action. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_M=SuHjaVB6qkzdkb_4S6HJk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEA0Ef96zL6DUtXhERAk1HAJ9ykOangZGQYZGrVv4slgASRzh4uACgnPql lR9YoVUPnaFja0ZR3i9dgUo= =5tyI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_M=SuHjaVB6qkzdkb_4S6HJk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list