From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDmD7-0001ek-Un for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:31:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RHSrTJ010051; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:28:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RHNPMB014558 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:25 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDm5l-0003F0-50 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDm5b-00038A-7h for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:15 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:09 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug #20201 and bbapm Message-ID: <20060227172309.17c1e7d5@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <440333A1.2030808@gentoo.org> References: <440333A1.2030808@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_4=N.jyg7B2qDbkGGeM=.wws"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: d9c4feea-cfeb-43c7-8e7d-d1e955792397 X-Archives-Hash: ffc37552f646b3199612e63589c5b005 --Sig_4=N.jyg7B2qDbkGGeM=.wws Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:15:13 -0500 Alec Warner wrote: | bbapm has been masked due to no one responding with anything useful to | last rites e-mail. It will be punted in 30 days. No no no. Do this properly. Clean up *all* the broken blackbox applets, not just the one that has someone whining on a bug report. There are at least two in the tree that're more broken than this. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_4=N.jyg7B2qDbkGGeM=.wws Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAzWC96zL6DUtXhERAsJSAJsHoZFJvF2UNl8ysSkLA12ZTJdH6wCdEvMA OF6N6wJyZf7FsnDXTK+0jCU= =Cw7P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_4=N.jyg7B2qDbkGGeM=.wws-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list