From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlTW-0007Kl-Nd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:43:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RGg907003599; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:42:09 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RGbBwN019212 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:12 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlN1-0000jK-4E for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlMw-0002dn-8c for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:03 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Message-ID: <20060227163703.07acbdb4@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1141016968.4846.23.camel@localhost> References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home> <20060226233558.GD11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060227000929.GC17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <440247DE.5010902@gentoo.org> <1141016968.4846.23.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_EqRPyUhjwiE6d5.pxz6_.GT; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a296e27a-8713-4184-b88c-d8ce674bf402 X-Archives-Hash: 46c61d9313c4a6b9afcd7ed029cdef6c --Sig_EqRPyUhjwiE6d5.pxz6_.GT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:09:28 -0500 Ned Ludd wrote: | I think I agree with the part that security@ having near final say. Security have (admittedly not very often) screwed up in the past. Fixing a security issue at the expense of utterly h0rking an arch, for example, is not an acceptable solution... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_EqRPyUhjwiE6d5.pxz6_.GT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAyqy96zL6DUtXhERAmIxAJ9VipfeOdWPSEOwhT+jbjNu1ik+DwCgmBjr sW1N0N92uc2e6C4e7Bq6tik= =LD7s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_EqRPyUhjwiE6d5.pxz6_.GT-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list