From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlOn-0005uf-Ce for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:39:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RGbBLM008119; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RGY8qE020673 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:34:08 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlK3-0005wk-QG for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:34:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlJy-0002bJ-Td for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:34:02 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:34:00 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision Message-ID: <20060227163400.45ead251@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200602271105.00801.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20060224141940.16864042@snowdrop.home> <20060226212953.GH31848@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net> <200602271105.00801.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_dltukC//IW3ulqCBlbQ1lG2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 30a4ac1b-e8fc-47e8-be25-1f2cd8146363 X-Archives-Hash: c9cdc06bc8ffcc76d7428aceda5f1564 --Sig_dltukC//IW3ulqCBlbQ1lG2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:05:00 +0100 Paul de Vrieze wrote: | Is there any valid reason that we can't have portage do this=20 | automatically. This particular way is very user-un-friendly. There's exactly one set of packages affected, and they're closed source and non-repackagable. I doubt it's high priority... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_dltukC//IW3ulqCBlbQ1lG2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAyn696zL6DUtXhERApzOAJ9ele7WC2YT6rCCN19FIQY61CN76wCgld9v ELa0TjpmoJq0jGp9a+vDxJg= =LrKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_dltukC//IW3ulqCBlbQ1lG2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list