From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDUQd-00044L-TH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:31:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1QMUxwe017270; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:30:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1QMRfnS031640 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:27:42 GMT Received: from [213.121.151.206] (helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDUMf-0004dP-DC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:27:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDUMU-0007ws-Cx for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:27:30 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:27:27 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision Message-ID: <20060226222727.02de3430@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1140992253.12236.98.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> References: <20060224141940.16864042@snowdrop.home> <20060226212953.GH31848@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net> <1140990884.12387.74.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <1140991366.22804.6.camel@Sabin.anyarch.net> <1140992253.12236.98.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_PC6TXKAEEflvh6UmRpIIK+.; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 93b3151d-df00-4286-abb4-3f63a47ce3e1 X-Archives-Hash: 50b182694dabcca7a9cb5044803f83c6 --Sig_PC6TXKAEEflvh6UmRpIIK+. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:17:33 +0000 Stuart Herbert wrote: | On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Ostrow wrote: | > That would work for fetch restricted packages, not nomirrored ones. |=20 | /me nods. That's what we'll have to do. Unfortunately, it leaves | users with a worse experience than before, but until I can find a way | to reach the QA team and help them see my pov as the package | maintainer, what else can I do? :( It leaves them without a weird Portage error message, and it removes the assumption that the user will study a particular document in great detail. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_PC6TXKAEEflvh6UmRpIIK+. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAitS96zL6DUtXhERArq/AKDhMICI0QRT+N9Z4LNv/u5QV86dOACgr22m CMEJwjjKJibR3TpZOjxjO7M= =VXez -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_PC6TXKAEEflvh6UmRpIIK+.-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list