public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)" <kevquinn@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:30:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060220203020.4c919c7a@c1358217.kevquinn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F9C08A.6020101@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:13:46 +0100
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
> own category?

Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
resolved, moving packages around should be avoided.  We've been over
the problems of the concept of categories many times, I don't see any
value in going through it in depth again as categories are too deeply
embedded to be changed.  Suffice to say that any package is likely to
have several reasonable categorisations, however the tree only supports
one. Different people will prefer different categorisations according
to each person's perspective, so moving packages to suit one perspective
just messes things up for another perspective.

> Maybe creating a logging herd would be an idea to, to remove the load
> from the base-system herd.

Creating a herd is not a problem; obviously herds and categories are
completely different things.  However a quick scan of the
logging-related packages in sys-admin shows they mostly do not belong
to a herd, so are not imposing any load on the base-system herd as such.
Creation of a herd for these packages would be a question for the
maintainers of those packages :)

-- 
Kevin F. Quinn

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-20 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-20 13:13 [gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging) Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
2006-02-20 14:06 ` John Mylchreest
2006-02-20 15:41 ` solar
2006-02-20 19:30 ` Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) [this message]
2006-02-20 23:37   ` Stuart Herbert
2006-02-21 10:20     ` Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
2006-02-21 10:21       ` Jochen Maes
2006-02-21 10:28       ` Ciaran McCreesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060220203020.4c919c7a@c1358217.kevquinn.com \
    --to=kevquinn@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox