From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F8j6G-00042Q-3s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:11:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1DJALmW019042; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:10:21 GMT Received: from hermes.orakel.ods.org (dsl67-66.fastxdsl.nl [62.251.66.67]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1DJ7spe007651 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:07:54 GMT Received: from aphrodite.orakel.ods.org ([172.17.2.15]) by hermes.orakel.ods.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F8j3B-0000Du-HT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:07:53 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:07:51 +0100 From: Grobian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions Message-ID: <20060213190751.GN14748@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <43EFA485.4060709@gentoo.org> <43F0D24A.6060409@gentoo.org> <20060213184918.59266fdb@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060213184918.59266fdb@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/ng-r778 (Darwin 8.4.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by hermes.orakel.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 931156bc-220f-4159-9dcb-50249cd99fd8 X-Archives-Hash: efc24a165cd1631a01e8d3ea74d5ca59 On 13-02-2006 18:49:18 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:06 +0100 Simon Stelling > wrote: > | NOTABUG sounds good, but as Ciaran said, we need another replacement > | for those bugs who really deserve it. If a user sticks > | -fvisibility=hidden into his CFLAGS (instead of CXXFLAGS), > | PLEASEGOAWAYKTHXBYE would be much more appropriate. > > They also deserve it if they stick it in their CXXFLAGS... I don't agree on such solution, because getting rid of personal frustrations of a developer should *not* be supported by Gentoo's Bugzilla. These kind of emotions give a rather weak signal, and do not really show any kind of profesionalism IMHO. If these frustrations get so apparent that they require a solution flag in Bugzilla for a developer, then it might be a better solution to just leave the bugzilla work to someone else and try to work a bit more away from the users for a while. It is a well known issue that people who have to work with others get frustrated (e.g. call-center employees). -- Fabian Groffen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list