From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F7093-0005SY-F7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:58:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k190w6BP027255; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:58:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k190uGSX013900 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:56:16 GMT Received: from zg041222.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.2.41.222] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1F706a-0001tO-3e for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:56:16 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20A58200D72; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:56:21 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:56:20 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060208231921.GB22793@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200602090924.08447.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20060209003036.GC22793@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20060209003036.GC22793@aerie.halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602090956.20964.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 94ced74b-cab2-47b5-bbe1-5e99bf8d5e78 X-Archives-Hash: 9673114c8f0be7bb804fbdfdf3b6488d On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote: > Jason Stubbs said: > > It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. > > Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until > > being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to > > express this with dependencies. > > You need either gcc-3.3 or libstdc++-v3. I don't see forcing either upon our > users to be a good thing. The upgrade doc covers how to do the 3.3->3.4 > upgrade, and I think most archs are on 3.4 at this point. Ok. If the there's an upgrade doc and 3.4 postinst points to it, no problem. I take it the dependencies you're asking about is for binary-only (or other?) packages that specifically depend on 3.3 then? -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list