From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F2Tzz-0006Pg-8a
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:50:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0RDm0w0002888;
	Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:48:00 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0RDh3i9018049
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:43:03 GMT
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F2TtZ-0000Ox-VH
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:44:10 +0000
Received: (qmail 18912 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2006 08:36:27 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2006 08:36:27 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] coreutils: deprecated behavior not so deprecated
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:44:14 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9
References: <200601232304.48891.vapier@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200601232304.48891.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200601270844.14500.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: a0cd2866-ab8f-4a5b-a9ae-9de4b3c7d166
X-Archives-Hash: e96d8bc4dd6b761bb06f6b3955142d09

On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> tail -1
> head -1
> <some other stuff i cant remember>

it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)

the source code was refactored and i assumed this to mean they cut out the 
backwards compat code without looking deeper into the source in case they had 
actually moved it, my bad
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list