From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F2FM7-0006NK-FH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:12:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0QMBqEO003050; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:11:52 GMT Received: from gw.open-hosting.net (gw.open-hosting.net [65.64.29.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0QM9xtM000453 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:10:00 GMT Received: from speedy.apps4med.net ([66.139.177.227]) by gw.open-hosting.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0QM9p06016351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:09:56 -0600 Message-Id: <200601262209.k0QM9p06016351@gw.open-hosting.net> From: MIkey Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:07:43 -0600 References: <200601251933.02768.mikey@badpenguins.com> <43D82AAB.4010501@gentoo.org> <200601252023.11481.mikey@badpenguins.com> <43D8BBB0.2020102@gentoo.org> <200601262148.k0QLmAZ8016042@gw.open-hosting.net> <43D94702.5040507@gentoo.org> User-Agent: KNode/0.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gw.open-hosting.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4-gr0 (2005-06-05) on gw.open-hosting.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k0QMBqFt003050 X-Archives-Salt: b790e780-c7a1-4c91-8831-79a1cb86a5e3 X-Archives-Hash: 50b4c9d18fc39c746f694b04464eed82 Jan Kundr=E1t wrote: > Great, there was a bug. Yeah, there was. Please notice the word "was". > It means that it has been fixed and it isn't there anymore. So the > problem got fixed. It's over. Finito. Period. Why are you still talking > about it? Because Becker needed to be informed about it. I know it was fixed, I am not bitching about it. I am merely pointing out that a stage3 installati= on isn't quite so simple to support and is just as prone (more prone in my opinion) to problems as a stage1 installation method. The main crux of what I am saying is that it is, in fact, more error prone and takes longe= r. =20 >> The official gcc migration instructions happen to be >> the same for both a stage3 install and a running installation. >=20 > Do you have some problems with understanding an English text? It was > already stated several times that upgrading GCC from fresh stage3 is > *not* the same as in the live system. Where are they then? How are they different? You might want to let some= one else know. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list