From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F29Jx-000709-EY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:46:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0QFiO7W004927; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:44:24 GMT Received: from gw.open-hosting.net (gw.open-hosting.net [65.64.29.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0QFfJtw001115 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:41:20 GMT Received: from speedy.apps4med.net ([66.139.177.227]) by gw.open-hosting.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0QFfAQQ011385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:41:16 -0600 From: Mikey To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:39:04 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <200601252023.11481.mikey@badpenguins.com> <1138284384.10589.48.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1138284384.10589.48.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2258072.ksOnd90o4s"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601260939.04124.mikey@badpenguins.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gw.open-hosting.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4-gr0 (2005-06-05) on gw.open-hosting.net X-Archives-Salt: 1aff7a13-f2b6-44a9-9c0a-24a952a11f32 X-Archives-Hash: 39bb72fc35488701536608370f33e3a3 --nextPart2258072.ksOnd90o4s Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 January 2006 08:06, Chris Gianelloni spammed: > > The difference in doing from stage1 instead of stage3 is you don't have > > to go through a gcc migration to prevent your build from being > > unusable. You also go through 1 gcc upgrade (gcc 3.3.5 -> gcc 3.4.4), > > not 3 (3.3.5 -> 3.3.6 -> 3.4.4). We are talking reality here, not > > fantasy. > > You don't have to go through the whole migration to work from a stage3, > either. Just because *you* did doesn't mean it is required, in any way. No you don't. Except for the first time I ran an update immediately after= =20 it came out and I was, in fact, switched over to the new gcc, in spite of=20 what the documentation said. All I did was an emerge -u system. I noticed= =20 it happened to several other users in the forums as well. So as long as you are not inadvertently switched over to the new gcc or kno= w=20 not to switch over to it without going to the migration guide, everything=20 should be peachy. Will gcc-3.4.4 be required in the 2006.0 profile? --nextPart2258072.ksOnd90o4s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD2O0YvLQEgKTTl9MRAnoBAJ9z65GOfuiH6An3yv3kvpnvJroFKgCgok33 VSRhWNXbSLXz8S/WwDxb80k= =RGpv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2258072.ksOnd90o4s-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list