From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F1uTS-00036r-OS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:54:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0PNralD030363; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:53:36 GMT Received: from gw.open-hosting.net (gw.open-hosting.net [65.64.29.89]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0PNoNFv024138 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:50:27 GMT Received: from spanky.linuxwiz.net (pcp457525pcs.7acres01.ar.comcast.net [68.51.10.211]) by gw.open-hosting.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0PNo8Bv004864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:50:18 -0600 Message-Id: <200601252350.k0PNo8Bv004864@gw.open-hosting.net> From: MIkey Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:50:04 -0600 References: <1138197403.10589.1.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1138225963.10589.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200601252235.k0PMZi2C004122@gw.open-hosting.net> <1138229912.10589.25.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> User-Agent: KNode/0.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gw.open-hosting.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4-gr0 (2005-06-05) on gw.open-hosting.net X-Archives-Salt: 0c5add1e-123a-4c06-b216-166fe1e97302 X-Archives-Hash: afaf2f96d1eaa24d1f9c74c60141c7ab Chris Gianelloni wrote: > You're reading it wrong. The bootstrap USE flag is set during > bootstrap, not the build USE flag. This means libstdc++-v3 (or gcc 3.3) > is required at the bootstrap level. The reason that libstdc++-v3 My mistake, it is just portage that gets that build flag during bootstrapping. Just out of curiosity, what does utilize the "build" flag, other than portage during bootstrapping? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list