On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:28:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:52, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Please lets avoid this assumption.  I'd love to make it so we never
> > make this assumption anywhere in the tree so that we could actually
> > build GCC without pie or ssp, instead of generating all of the GCC
> > profiles for every user.

SPLIT_SPECS="no" in make.conf causes just the profile default to be
built - is that good enough?

> pie is in upstream gcc so your argument here is INVALID

and -fno-stack-protector is only a problem if gcc-4.0 is built without
the ssp-stubs - from 4.1 onwards that'll be upstream as well.

Having said that, I don't think we need -fno-stack-protector in default
DEBUG_FLAGS anyway, as it doesn't inhibit debug (unlike -Wl,pie).

-- 
Kevin F. Quinn