From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ezpjd-0003oj-5N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:26:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0K6PeXq006376; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:25:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0K6NLsr024071 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:23:21 GMT Received: from cp237988-a.mill1.nb.home.nl ([84.29.235.69] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Ezpg8-0005VE-Ov for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:23:21 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:25:15 +0100 From: Harald van =?utf-8?Q?D=C4=B3k?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2 Message-ID: <20060120062515.GA29222@gentoo.org> References: <200601150111.54995.vapier@gentoo.org> <200601191756.47460.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601191756.47460.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 1e0a0f76-5343-41df-812e-494937120960 X-Archives-Hash: 3d43479bf0d01a719911f7db799cdde4 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:56:47PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > - USE=3Ddebug *never* changes CFLAGS or LDFLAGS or what have you, it *onl= y*=20 > enables additional runtime code (such as assert()'s or helpful debug=20 > output) ... I'd like to see cases such as "use debug && append-flags -DDEBUG" explicitly mentioned, please. I'm sure you meant that this is okay, but to avoid confusion, could you actually say so? (Or, if I'm completely misunderstanding, tell me it's not okay. :) --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0IJKwnQyISwouHwRAs/FAKCJmJINh2wq3IWDs/RrFLkuTkJPhACeN9ha zOGd34q4sa1yk/EdT2uxsg8= =oYmi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list