From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EydZS-0007Ol-Sg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:15:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0GNEjO1028227; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:14:45 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0GNCxWK007693 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:13:00 GMT Received: from 83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.33.139] helo=osgiliath.brixandersen.dk) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EydX1-0006E6-Fx for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:12:59 +0000 Received: by osgiliath.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A31151E4; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:12:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:12:57 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] pdf use flags Message-ID: <20060116231257.GA21208@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060116225449.23c0a35c@sven.genone.homeip.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116225449.23c0a35c@sven.genone.homeip.net> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: ccb1d1e9-458d-4a71-b5de-b00fd67edf0e X-Archives-Hash: cf426fa057bc23022a5a6d37533b4b04 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:54:49PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > Checking for pdf use flags I just found that there are currently at > least three different flags for pdf stuff in the tree: > - pdflib (global) > - cpdflib (global) > - pdf (several local ones) >=20 > All of them mean basically the same (one exception, see below). > I suggest we unify them to one single global "pdf" flag. The following > packages would be affected by this: Funny - I was planning on posting a similar mail about IUSE=3Dpdf later this week. Thumbs up from me. Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFDzCh4v+Q4flTiePgRArMKAKCcrPjZL+7YxoZbvVvIsNZg7wQVVwCeIiPc PWi91zWdKQhOIrnl0QIZgXs= =MRnj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list