From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ExqIk-0006SN-Pb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:38:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0EIbK8Z018590; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:37:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0EIYJ3v031267 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:34:19 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ExqEE-0000AN-Ro for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:34:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 6262 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 13:30:37 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 13:30:37 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - new category dev-tos Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:35:55 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43C8B731.70806@gentoo.org> <20060114134721.2a8e19e9@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060114134721.2a8e19e9@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601141335.55360.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: fdcbb49d-8cc5-4acb-a8de-5930951db120 X-Archives-Hash: 4129f7d4c4e6bb8496398281595b31d2 On Saturday 14 January 2006 08:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:49 +0100 sanchan <sanchan@gentoo.org> wrote: > | Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since > | actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a > | dev-tos category. It will take a few weeks in order to have all the > | ebuilds updated for the new release of tinyos, have them reviewed by > | peer an committed to the tree, but it's a lot easier to make a > | category early rather than moving stuff. > > Any reason for dev- rather than sys-? I believe we're going with > sys-fbsd... yes, but fbsd is a self hosting env, tinyos is not i wish there was a way we could convey the embedded aspect (embed-tos ?), but dev-tos works for me -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list