From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ExQ0K-0000Ay-Sa for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:34:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0DEWd8L001955; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:32:39 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0DESOwV001881 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:28:24 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760DB2E8275 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:28:49 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:28:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43B975FD.1000401@gentoo.org> <20060105163336.1735be8d@snowdrop.home> <1136480603.20002.80.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1136480603.20002.80.camel@localhost> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2081482.WE3Bh3VgUx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601131528.49207.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c5eb978f-618b-453f-b8d4-a8bcd168af3b X-Archives-Hash: 7770a45293245a747272c2e8db1174ec --nextPart2081482.WE3Bh3VgUx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 05 January 2006 18:03, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Exactly :-) But I guess many among us have become a bit disillusioned > and try to stay away from what is perceived as useless trolling and > silly infights. So things either stall in discussion or get implemented > with the "obvious" flawed approach (early webapp-config and portage are > good examples) and then take a long time to become "fixed". There's > still a lot of good stuff happening, but as someone else said in this > thread, "we suck at execution" :-( I guess, the council should be more brave, and make decisions like=20 rejecting flawed approaches. Even when discussions have not been thrown=20 up and re-eaten again. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart2081482.WE3Bh3VgUx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDx7khbKx5DBjWFdsRAsTyAJ4/7owlNexdViDBuAIa7EW87iGR4QCg24b4 89JSaP0+/kf5S5IqDErlank= =qR32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2081482.WE3Bh3VgUx-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list