From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EueQQ-0006JO-AY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:21:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k05NKPmC009977; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:20:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k05NHMKI014809 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:17:22 GMT Received: from d070237.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.70.237] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EueMD-00060j-KF for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:17:21 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:17:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <43B96D6D.8080107@gentoo.org> <20060105122405.4fe75eac@snowdrop.home> <43BD9806.1080408@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43BD9806.1080408@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5265018.WkNyIusF0r"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601060017.18814.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0918bfbc-2ff4-46de-a79a-416e26b26e68 X-Archives-Hash: 99c7c7b2f3e6a43f123d02b29e6b254f --nextPart5265018.WkNyIusF0r Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 05 January 2006 23:04, Curtis Napier wrote: > > No, that's censored to only display what certain people want it to say > > rather than the truth of what's going on. > > Censored? Please expand on this, how is it censored? I thought we were > allowed to put anything Gentoo related we want to in our Gentoo blog? It's censored in the sense, that you limit the audience. Blog's are not sui= ted=20 for general information/discussion, because no one wants to monitor dozens = of=20 them and follow multiple threads on different web pages on one and the same= =20 topic. Weblogs are useful for people who feel it's necessary to have their= =20 own prominent place to raise their voice - a self-projection thingie, that'= s=20 all. And therefore 99,5% of all the blogs are superfluous. Also a blog owne= r=20 controls the comments and can delete them as he likes (less important, sinc= e=20 it lets him not look good, but he can). To make it short: When you really have something important to say, post it = to=20 the appropriate mailing list - and post the whole text, not a ridiculous li= nk=20 to your blog, most people are not interested in and won't read! The same go= es=20 for our userbase: They're right to expect a single source of general=20 information and one for security information, but not being forced to follo= w=20 lots of blogs. Carsten --nextPart5265018.WkNyIusF0r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDvaj+VwbzmvGLSW8RAuf5AJ9XDmLZ5fn0Nf85IB1/vIet1ByxcQCdFHow nFXqT4AlMr7FNWVEYPTtG3M= =VV8N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5265018.WkNyIusF0r-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list