From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuYFP-0000wt-Og for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:45:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k05Gj4Dk017531; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:45:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k05GfLKg023735 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:41:21 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EuYAy-0000g7-UV for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:41:21 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuYAs-00054p-Bu for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:41:14 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:41:12 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates Message-ID: <20060105164112.18700183@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060105162813.GA25581@gentoo.org> References: <1136476815.20002.45.camel@localhost> <20060105162813.GA25581@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_zNQFN3mWNNHKH6vCYuoSa2Z; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 413e7447-1670-45d3-b3db-2c993f07bbc3 X-Archives-Hash: 92b643c0fa45f79843fe4750a861e826 --Sig_zNQFN3mWNNHKH6vCYuoSa2Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian wrote: | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the | portage sources that say to fix/implement X, a discussion on project | ML Y working on Z. Would our users really like to read a lengthy discussion on the intricacies of the changes made to versionator.eclass to improve performance, or the way in which the ten zillion packages needed by the new KDE/Gnome/Xorg release were keyworded for a particular arch, or the design decisions made for vim-spell.eclass to avoid requiring that our users have four gigs of RAM? I mean, it'd be pretty frickin' boring... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_zNQFN3mWNNHKH6vCYuoSa2Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDvUwq96zL6DUtXhERAs4LAJwJQK/SHEzKPbGKb1ySYES9gB2pZwCeJKpf hQbEzwUWR99ehi/eMW4iKU4= =qtVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_zNQFN3mWNNHKH6vCYuoSa2Z-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list